Los Angeles Medical Malpractice Law Firm
Los Angeles Medical Malpractice Attorney The Firm Attorneys Free Evaluation Contact Us
Medical Malpractice
Anesthesia Error
Birth Injuries
Blood Transfusion Injuries
Brain Injuries
Contaminated Instruments
Cosmetic Surgery Errors
Emergency Room Errors
Failure to Diagnose
Infections in Hospitals
Injury Caused by Radiation
Kaiser Medical Malpractice
Legal Malpractice
Medical Equipment Failure
Medical Negligence
Medication Errors
Misdiagnosing Cancer
Pediatric Meningitis
Surgical Errors
Wrongful Death
Frequently Asked Questions

Failure to Diagnose is Leading Cause of Medical Malpractice Claims

A new study reveals that the payout for successful medical malpractice claims has increased, while the number of lawsuits has decreased. The study reviewed cases filed over the course of the last 20 years, and notes a decline by a little over 56% in lawsuits filed, with an average increase in payout up to $353,000. The payout amounts vary by type of specialty. Some attribute the decrease to tort reform, which has capped the amount which may be paid for non-economic damages.

In California, this limit is $250,000. As a result of the arbitrary figure, many classes of potential plaintiffs – including children and the elderly – may find the expense in pursuing a medical malpractice claim not worth it. Additionally, some groups cite improved safety measures at hospitals the reason for the decline in claims. However, statistics show that medical mistakes remain a leading cause of death in the United States. The failure to diagnose is the leading cause of medical negligence.

For more information or if you believe you have been harmed by medical negligence, please contact our experienced Los Angeles medical malpractice lawyers for an immediate consultation.

Categories: Failure to diagnose
Attorney Web Design

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.